Though our analyses find a great fit to your analysis, i examined whether several other design you can expect to fit the info just as well or finest (MacCallum, Wegener, Uchino, & Fabrigar, 1993). Shape 2 gift ideas that it inversed causation solution design lower than.
An option exploratory architectural model: Imagine if intimate bias forecasts telecommunications and positive event with homosexuals, seen similarity that have peers’ attitudes towards homosexuality, and you will religiosity. Most of the good lines depict statistically extreme pathways in the .05 level. Magnitudes from association is actually given the quality errors from inside the parentheses; X dos (61, Letter = 360) = . Normed (NFI), non-normed (NNFI), and relative (CFI) goodness-of-fit is .91, .91, .93, respectively; RMSEA is .09.
Theoretically, it is simply given that possible that individuals with better negative perceptions towards the homosexuality carry out avoid getting homosexual males and you will lesbians, rating its interactions once the bad, seeing their friends because the with additional thinking with the gay pЕ™esmД›rovГЎn people, otherwise get a hold of reassurance regarding their philosophy within religiosity
This new approach model got a good fit, [? dos (61, N = 360) = , p dos =11%); positive feel having homosexual boys and you may lesbians (?=-.fifty, se = .06, p 2 =25%); sensed peer parallels within attitudes with the homosexuals (?=-.19, se = .08, p dos =4%); and you can, religiosity (?=.48, se = .04, p 2 =23%). Significant correlations were discover to the disruptions regarding thought of similarities with peers’ perceptions on homosexuals and their early in the day affairs with gay guys and you will lesbians (r=.18, se = .06, p dos =.11); 25% out-of participants’ positive skills that have homosexual individuals (Roentgen 2 =.25); 4% regarding fellow similarities with gay everyone (R dos =.04); and you can 23% out of religiosity (Roentgen 2 =.23).
If you are these types of answers are distinguished, we compared and that model suitable the data better using the Design AIC and Design CAIC coefficients for low-nested model evaluations and every models’ complement indicator. The initial design got a much better complement (Model AIC=; Model CAIC=-; NFI = .92; NNFI = .92; CFI = .94; RMSEA = .08) as compared to alternative model (Design AIC = & CAIC=-; NFI = .91; NNFI = .91; CFI = .93; RMSEA = .09). The real difference inside the fit along the several models means all of our new model’s theoretical rationale fits the info most readily useful (Byrne, 1994).
Talk
I establish an architectural model to evaluate if relationships and you can confident experience with homosexuals, thought of parallels that have peers’ thinking on homosexuality, and religiosity was indeed predictive out of sexual prejudice among a people out of Puerto Rican teenagers. Our very own findings strongly recommend most of the hidden parameters, except for peers’ thinking to the homosexuality, predict participants’ sexual bias towards gay folks. If you find yourself past scientists have discovered intimate bias are high for males than just ladies (Kite, 1992; Herek, 2000b), we had been not able to imitate this type of abilities.
What amount of homosexual people known from the professionals reduced their reported sexual bias with the gay everyone. It trying to find shows that Puerto Rican youth’s intimate bias is generally determined by the lack of connection with gays and you can lesbians. The new stigmatization from gay visitors regarding Puerto Rican area can get limit certain students’ exposure to gay people and lesbians. Within this society, delivering inside the-classification boards with homosexual men and you may lesbians, such as for example, may support students’ relationships which have gay males and you can lesbians. Almost every other experts are finding such classroom things drop-off specific heterosexual’s bad appraisals towards the homosexual males and you will lesbians (Sakalli & Ugurlu, 2001).
The conclusions in addition to recommend that participants’ self-confident experience which have homosexual guys and lesbians exert an impacts within their sexual bias into gay individuals. Participants’ recall out-of self-confident experiences that have gay men and lesbians is actually firmly predictive of the sexual bias. Also, the current presence of a positive organization anywhere between participants’ interactions that have homosexuals in addition to their remember out of positive experience using this class indicates an enthusiastic iterative techniques where Puerto Rican young people you will definitely boost otherwise fall off the intention to interact that have homosexual group within after minutes. These findings advise that Puerto Rican more youthful adults’ appraisals of their exposure to homosexual people are especially important within the structure and implementation of facts to cut back intimate bias. Points and you may settings promoting an environment where anticipate and you will open dialogue try normalized can get assists confident interchanges. Search about what comprises confident experiences between Puerto Rican heterosexual and you can homosexual visitors will become necessary.
